Why I didn’t become an Architect

November 1, 2009

By Rusaila Bazlamit
Originally published on Reflect Upon

Yesterday I read an article by Orhan Pamuk titled “Why I didn’t become an Architect” from his book “Other Colors“.
In this article Pamuk starts with a journey he took to one of the underprivileged sites of Istanbul where he walks into buildings that had very different past than their current present. He talks about how people came to live in buildings that were built by outsiders of Istanbul… and he had some interesting insights about who at the end the architecture aims to serve!
From this he take us to a decision he made as a third year student of architecture to drop architecture and change his career to become a writer and a novelist… He describes the difference for him between empty sheets that were waiting for “modernist” architectural designs and between empty sheets that were waiting for “his” words…
He ends his article with more reflections about architecture and the-serving-who dilemma as he walks in the ruins of the aftermath of the earthquake that hit Istanbul in recent years.
Through his personal recollections of his decision… he gave me a better understanding of my own choice to stop practicing architecture…

Later on last night I had an interesting phone call from one of my good friends who happen to be an architect though now she is more of an urban designer.
And I was sharing with her my reading… and I found myself expressing my own reasons of leaving architecture…

Probably the first detachment between me and architecture happened when I was taught history of architecture… through these courses I was somehow taught to appreciate architecture and master pieces through their images. So what was designed to be an experiential space was projected through lenses and prints into a see-and-admire experience. I truly understood the depth of this problem when I had the chance to visit famous buildings while I was at the USA. When I went to see the Guggenheim in NY… I was brought into tears… standing there in the massive lobby gave me an experience which I can’t put into words let alone images… I felt something…

My second detachment happened when I couldn’t relate the big talks and deep concepts that some of my fellow classmates would come up with… and I forcing my self to see the reflections of these concepts in their designs.. but all in vain… I would be standing bewildered and left to think I’m less than the rest of them… because my concepts were not projected as I wanted into my spaces…

This feeling got even worse when I started meeting up with the big names of Architecture at our Amman… and even worse when I did my internship at the company of one of them….

====
Being myself the daughter of an architect… my father… is the type of architects that you should make a film about… my father embodies the real architect struggle to be an architect in a society dominated by empty concepts or trendy designs… [coming to think of it... I should make a film about my father... just like Nathaniel Kahn did "My Architect"]
My father supported my decision of leaving architecture behind… though I know that he is much in love with architecture… for him… architecture is creating a place where a person can feel… that is the only concept my father ever followed in any of his designs… His style of architecture has changed according to time, place and his own maturity… maybe one of these days I should blog about his work…
====

But now back to me and my reasons of leaving architecture…
I stopped at the big talk of the big names… as I said… after working for one of them… I realized that architecture as it is being used is not in harmony with who we were and who we aim to serve…

After that… I graduated and joined the working force… I began to read for Rem Koolhaas… the more I worked… the more I read… the more a nagging voice inside of me got louder…

Until the day I decided to liberate myself… from “… the obligation to construct…”

I turned all my creative abilities… all the crazy concepts and ideas that were rattling inside of my head into different media which for me made sense…. and felt more natural…

Now, I don’t feel any need to be pretentious… to add any glamor to my products… I express myself… and I don’t do that to serve anyone… yet somehow I’m serving more now than I ever did… or thought I would…

The way I see it… The problem with architecture is that it is used to glorify the architect’s mind and visual abilities… or maybe as Pamuk said to serve his/her imagination…

Architecture as I was taught and seen practiced is creating empty spaces… and for that reason I left architecture….

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

15 Responses to “Why I didn’t become an Architect”

  1. Bayan Bahlou Says:

    Thank you for sharing your thoughts and feelings about what’s happening on the architecture world around you, cause it sounds almost the same dawn here…
    And i really hope to know more about your new direction that could help you in finding peace somehow…

    Bayan Bahloul
    (5th year architecture student/Damascus University)


  2. Rusaila apparently your post triggered some controversy! hehe
    I think lots of people, specially architecture student were affiliated to it- you probably should follow this by a reflection on Rem’s concept of ‘architecture liberated from the obligation to build’ and the alternative manners architecture could operate on.
    Interruptions as an example! hehe

    @Bayan: thank your for commenting, I notified Rusaila of your comment and hopefully she’ll elaborate on this!


  3. “Architecture as I was taught and seen practiced is creating empty spaces… and for that reason I left architecture…”
    Well put! But I think this is the same reason that should make us rise above it all!
    At least I believe that its people who are conscious enough to notice that who will!

  4. Rusaila Says:

    :: Bayan… my first way of expressing myself was design, using interactive digital media… I created several interactive installation which demands people’s input to complete the piece… there are two videos on youtube… I have a web filter on my internet so I can’t give you the direct link… but if you go to youtube and search my name… the two videos will show up… one is “Nature rePlay” and another is “Through The Veil”…. so this just in general…

    :: Interruptions [Khaled]… Wow… I wonder if my boss read this what he’ll think! =)… and I’ll try to write more about me and Koolhaas’s quote…

    :: Yazan… My own personal choice of rising above it… was by leaving architectural “building” as a medium of expression… but whether by choice or not… my way of thinking and perceiving the world around is shaped by my 5 years of studying architecture…


  5. Here’s the link to Rusaila’s youtube videos
    http://www.youtube.com/user/superdevoika

  6. Bayan Bahloul Says:

    Rusaila… I’ve just had a look at your videos…i liked them …
    Thanks.. keep the good work..
    And i’ll be more than happy if you keep sharing with us.. so we can be inspired..

    Bayan

  7. hadialaeddin Says:

    rusaila, and everyone of us, wondered what kind of experience it would be studying design or architecture outside the region!
    To me it was always this fantastical world with wise oracles as professors… But now we know the common issues in all edcational institutes in the world – as it will be shown in [noise] edition of Interruptions…

    I stumbled upon this nice post… It’s relevant to what you we saying about experiencing architecture spatially and being really involved…

    Link here
    http://www.dailytonic.com/field-chapel-by-students-of-the-illinois-institute-of-technology-with-ecker-architekten/

  8. Khaled Sedki Says:

    Hadi you should’ve quit on Facebook a long time ago!


  9. Interruptions renounces sweet optimism.

  10. Zeena Sabeeleish Says:

    Well.. As a colleague of Rusaila I would notify here that I really respect and support her choice of being honest with herself and finding peace somewhere else and never regretting it. She is definitely serving people now and bringing much more joy to them than she would be doing while designing elite spaces.
    I think architecture is becoming a show-business where architects are forgetting the basic human need for architecture and are being selfish enough to impose their ad-hoc ideas on people’s lives.

  11. Rusaila Says:

    Bayan, Thanks a lot for your nice words…
    Hadi, I’m looking forward to the “Noise” edition… and thanks for the link shared…
    Zeena, Thanks again for your comment…

    I just want to say that I think that the biggest problem of architects is that they add a sort of sainthood on their works… by creating big concepts that would leave many people in awe with them… but going down to the basics… there is nothing really of it… and this is what I renounce… is trying to play the role of a savior…

    And that’s why I like what I’m doing now… it is because I work on very small scale… with one or two simple messages… that I want to share… without claiming that I’ll make the world a better place or anything… Like many of my colleagues back at Architecture school were pretending to do…

    It comes down to honesty with oneself…

  12. Khaled Sedki Says:

    Well sorry only now I felt like commenting on your post Rusaila, I kinda had loads to say about this that’s probably why I said nothing!
    Well first let’s start by noticing this, architecture among all other creative fields is a profession where the realization of ideas is subject to external forces; politics, economics, culture etc while generating concepts/imagenation is personal, it takes mass collaboration of capital, authority, legistlations, executions force and complimentary cultural context to physically interpret these concepts.

    So it’s all of these parts of the equation that constitute the role of architecture and its bounding margins, as the architect, at the end of the day, serves those licensed to build!
    Rem in the same book mentions that no architect can claim to work for the public good since architecture is powered by market force, but he also refers to the role of the architect in the Soviet Union where all Utopias were exercised in different parts of the CCCP where mass social equality was what drove architectural production since
    the 1920s influencing the constructivists/structuralist movement renouncing abstract social detachment of architecture, literature and the arts which inspired architects all over Europe and produced progressive shifts such as Situationists International, Constant Noewenhuys and others who embraced architeture as a responsive social commitment and a tool for r/evolution.

    So what happened? Capital bought the masses, and among those That capital bought were Sartre and then Derrida who restricted ‘meaning’ to the ‘expression of meaning’ so architects lost the utopia and preserved the ego..

    So look for those with the authority to ‘architect’ cities, the political and economic context one functions within, ataturk in Turkey surely didn’t aim at reviving slums or elevating low-income conditions or developing industrial zones..
    Yet if that was Pamuk’s reason for leaving architecture then it’s disappointing such reasons got him to write things like “my name is Red” and seek a Nobel prize by writing about the Armenians.
    It wouldv made much more sense if such reasons came from Aziz Nissen!

  13. zaid awamleh Says:

    I am so proud to be one of rusailas students in GJU .. actually i can feel the creative person behind her mysterious character :) she has her own way of teaching (which i love) that you should look deep enough in your self to show up a feeling or an idea .. i wish that she can teach us next semester but after reading this article !! I DONT THINK SO ! .. wish the best for you and i hope to get your chance because YOU have somethings to do .. sincerely , zaid

  14. Rusaila Says:

    Khaled… I would advise you to read the article yourself.. What I mentioned in my article is my own understanding and reflections…
    Zaid… thank you for your nice words…


Leave a Reply